BPC-157 vs TB-500: Evidence, Legal Status and Differences
BPC-157 vs TB-500 at a glance
| Fact | BPC-157 | TB-500 |
|---|---|---|
| Also known as | Body Protection Compound-157, BPC 157, BPC157 | Thymosin beta-4 fragment (LKKTETQ), Ac-LKKTETQ |
| What it is | Synthetic 15-amino-acid peptide derived from a gastric protein sequence | Synthetic fragment of thymosin beta-4 |
| Evidence level | Preclinical (lab and animal studies) | Preclinical (lab and animal studies) |
| Approved products | None | None |
| United States | Not FDA-approved; FDA staff recommended against adding BPC-157 to the 503A compounding list, and although FDA's advisory committee voted 8–6 to recommend it in July 2026, FDA has not added it [16][4][15]. | Not FDA-approved; FDA staff recommended against adding TB-500 to the 503A compounding list, and although FDA's advisory committee voted 8–6 to recommend it in July 2026, FDA has not added it [16][5][15]. |
| United Kingdom | No UK-licensed medicine containing BPC-157 appears in the MHRA products database [17]. | No UK-licensed medicine containing TB-500 appears in the MHRA products database [22]. |
| European Union | No medicine containing BPC-157 is authorized in the EU, according to EMA's central and Article 57 product data [18][19]. | No medicine containing TB-500 is authorized in the EU, according to EMA's central and Article 57 product data [18][19]. |
| Canada | No product containing BPC-157 appears in Health Canada's Drug Product Database [20]. | No product containing TB-500 appears in Health Canada's Drug Product Database [20]. |
| Australia | Schedule 4 (prescription-only) in Australia's Poisons Standard, with possession without authority prohibited under Appendix D [21]. | TB-500 and thymosin beta-4 are both Schedule 4 (prescription-only) in Australia's Poisons Standard, with possession without authority prohibited under Appendix D [21]. |
| Sport (WADA) | Named as an example of a non-approved substance (S0), prohibited at all times [13]. | Thymosin beta-4 and its derivatives, including TB-500, are prohibited at all times under S2 [13]. |
| Vendors we track | 82 vendors | 80 vendors |
| Our lab tests | None yet | None yet |
BPC-157 and TB-500 are two different peptides that are often marketed for similar purposes and sold side by side, sometimes premixed in one vial [4, 5]. BPC-157 is a synthetic 15-amino-acid peptide based on a sequence from gastric juice [1]. TB-500 is understood to be a seven-amino-acid fragment of a different natural protein, thymosin beta-4 [5, 6]. Neither is an approved medicine, and for both, almost all of the evidence comes from animal and cell studies [2, 10].
What each one is
BPC-157 (“body protection compound 157”) is a synthetic pentadecapeptide, a chain of 15 amino acids, whose sequence was originally isolated from gastric juice [1]. It has no United States Adopted Name and is not a component of any FDA-approved drug [4].
TB-500 is the name used for products that FDA understands to contain a synthetic seven-amino-acid fragment of thymosin beta-4 (Tβ4) [5]. Tβ4 itself is a naturally occurring peptide of 43 amino acids [6]. When anti-doping chemists analyzed a product sold as TB-500, they identified the acetylated 17–23 fragment of Tβ4, Ac-LKKTETQ [7]. So “TB-500” and “thymosin beta-4” are different molecules, even though they are often discussed as if they were the same [7, 5].
How the evidence compares
For BPC-157, a 2025 systematic review of the orthopedic literature included 36 studies: 35 were preclinical, one was clinical, and the authors found no clinical safety data [2]. A separate 2025 review counted three small human pilot studies, in knee pain, interstitial cystitis and an intravenous safety study, and concluded that rigorous, large-scale trials are lacking [1]. FDA’s 2026 review found five small, short human studies in all, adding one in healthy volunteers and one in people with ulcerative colitis [4]. An earlier review noted that most studies used small rodent models and that only a handful of research groups had studied the peptide in depth [3].
For TB-500, the gap is wider. FDA has not identified any human exposure data for the fragment [9]. Most published research concerns full-length Tβ4, which sped up healing in animal wound models and was tested in small phase 2 trials in pressure ulcers, venous ulcers and epidermolysis bullosa wounds [8, 6]. Because the fragment and the full-length protein are different molecules [7, 5], those trials don’t show what TB-500 itself does. A 2026 primer for sports-medicine physicians found that Tβ4 and TB-500 promoted blood-vessel growth and tissue repair in preclinical models, but that human orthopedic data are lacking [10].
A 2026 review of peptides sold directly to patients, which covered both compounds, concluded that rigorous human safety data are scarce for unapproved peptides like these [11].
Regulation and sport
Neither compound is an approved medicine in the markets in the table above. FDA’s compounding advisory committee reviewed both in July 2026, but its vote is not binding and FDA has not added either to its list of substances pharmacies may compound with [12, 15]; WADA prohibits both at all times [13].
Quality risks when buying
Products sold for “research use” are made and sold largely outside drug regulation [11, 2]. FDA says it has encountered multiple salts and derivatives sold under each name [4, 5], and its safety review flagged possible immune reactions (immunogenicity) and peptide-related impurities for both [9]. For BPC-157, FDA treats the free base and the acetate salt as distinct substances, so a certificate of analysis (COA) should say which form was tested [4]. For TB-500, the COA should state the exact sequence and molecular mass, because the fragment and full-length Tβ4 are not interchangeable [7]. Thymosin beta-4 was also among the black-market products analyzed by the Cologne anti-doping laboratory in Germany between 2010 and 2013 [14].
A vial that combines both peptides is harder to check: its report should measure each peptide separately. Our guides explain how to read a peptide COA, how to check a peptide vendor and what “research use only” means.
More on each
The BPC-157 overview and the TB-500 overview go into each compound’s sources in more depth. We track current listings on the BPC-157 price page and the TB-500 price page, and premixed vials separately on the BPC-157 and TB-500 blend page.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between BPC-157 and TB-500?
They are different molecules. BPC-157 is a synthetic 15-amino-acid peptide whose sequence was originally isolated from gastric juice. TB-500 is understood to be a seven-amino-acid fragment of thymosin beta-4, a naturally occurring 43-amino-acid peptide.
Is BPC-157 or TB-500 an approved medicine?
No. Neither is approved as a medicine in the US, UK, EU, Canada or Australia. FDA's compounding advisory committee reviewed both in July 2026, and FDA had not added either to its list of substances pharmacies may compound with when we checked.
Is there human evidence for BPC-157 or TB-500?
Very little. FDA's 2026 review found only five small, short human studies of BPC-157, and a 2025 review concluded that rigorous, large-scale trials are lacking. FDA has found no human exposure data for TB-500 itself; the small human trials that exist tested full-length thymosin beta-4 in wound healing.
Are BPC-157 and TB-500 allowed in sport?
No. WADA prohibits both at all times.